The Specialisation of EU Regions in Fast Growing and Key Enabling Technologies
Rinaldo Evangelista, Valentina Meliciani and Antonio Vezzani
In the context of the Europe 2020 objective of establishing in the EU a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy, European regions have been called to design and implement national and regional 'Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation' (RIS3). The rationale behind the concept of smart specialisation is that, in a context of global competition for talent and resources, most regions can only acquire a real competitive edge by finding niches or by mainstreaming new technologies into traditional industries and exploiting their ‘smart' regional potential.
Although the most promising way for a region to promote its knowledge-based growth is to diversify into technologies, products and services that are closely related to existing dominant technologies and the regional skills base, the European Commission puts special emphasis on a set of technologies labelled as 'Key Enabling Technologies' (KETs). Despite the great emphasis on KETs, there is only very limited evidence on the capability of EU regions to specialise in these fields and there are no studies directly investigating the actual impact of these technologies on regional innovation and economic growth. This report aims at filling these gaps by: i) looking at the relationship between KETs and 'Fast Growing Technologies' (FGTs); ii) providing empirical evidence on the EU regional specialisation in KETs and FGTs; iii) relating technological specialisation to regional innovation and economic growth. In particular, the report aims at answering these questions: 1) Which technologies have emerged as the fastest growing ones in the recent decades? 2) Is there a relationship between fast growing technologies and KETs? 3) Which regions are specialised in FGTs and KETs? 4) Are there convergence and polarization phenomena observable in the evolution of EU regions' innovative activities in fast growing technologies and KETs? 5) Do EU regions specialized in fastest growing technological fields and key enabling technologies exhibit higher innovation and economic performances?
The main results of the report can be summarised as follows. First, only a small share of KETs are also fast growing technologies, although the degree of overlapping between KETs and FGTs varies substantially across different KETs fields. Second, while KETs are concentrated in Central Europe, FGTs prevail in Scandinavian countries and the UK. Third, while there is evidence of some regional convergence in KETs and, to a less extent, in FGTs, spatial correlation increases over time, showing that diffusion often occurs across contiguous regions. Finally, the results of the estimations of the effects of FGTs and KETs on innovation (patents) and economic (GDP per capita) growth show that only specialisation in KETs directly affects economic growth, while specialisation in FGTs has an impact on growth only indirectly, that is through its impact on regions' innovation performances. Overall, these results confirm the pervasive and enabling role of KETs pointing to the importance for European regions to target these technologies as part of their RIS3 strategies.
The capability of the EU R&D Scoreboard companies to develop Advanced Manufacturing Technologies
The aim of this study is to provide empirical evidence at the firm level about the role of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTs) and Key Enabling Technologies (KETS) and the impact of innovation in these technologies on the efficiency and productivity of companies across various industrial sectors using data from the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (the Scoreboard). The principal aim of this report is to describe the profile of the patent portfolios of the companies in the Scoreboard, to link their innovation output to input in terms of R&D expenditures and to draw useful conclusions about the policy implications at the level of the EU Member States. The data source for the input is the 2013 edition of the Scoreboard and the outputs and patent applications and further patent-related indicators at the transnational level from the Worldwide Patent Statistical Database (PATSTAT). The focus is on the firm-level data and the basic questions addressed are as follows: What firms are responsible for most of the patent filings in AMTs and KETs and which are the main industrial sectors responsible for patent filings within the two technology fields? Where have the R&D activities taken place? Which countries and which sectors are most actively inventing AMTs and KETs? Among companies in the Scoreboard there is a correlation between R&D expenditure and investment in innovation and innovation output, as measured by KET- and AMT-related transnational patent filings.
World Corporate Top R&D Investors: Innovation and IP bundles
Hélène Dernis, Mafini Dosso, Fernando Hervás, Valentine Millot, Mariagrazia Squicciarini and Antonio Vezzani
This report presents original data and statistics on the innovation output of world top corporate R&D investors. Essentially descriptive in nature, it presents statistics about the technological profiles of companies, their trademark strategies for new products and services and about the extent to which these two forms of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are bundled to protect and appropriate the returns from investment in knowledge-based assets. The report provides interesting insights about the innovation strategies of this sample of world leading corporate R&D investors and opens the door to further research and analysis about companies' global strategies for knowledge development and exploitation. The main target audience of this report is the policy and research communities, as well as analysts with an interest in supporting evidence-based policy making in the area of innovation and industrial policies.
This joint EC-OECD report builds on the efforts to collect up-to-date, reliable and comparable company data on the top corporate R&D investors worldwide carried-out by the European Commission since 2004 (the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard publication) and on the solid knowledge and experience of the OECD in developing and providing robust and state of the art indicators on science, technology and industry (see for example OECD's STI Scoreboard publications).
To access the EC-JRC/OECD COR&DIP© database, v.0. 2015 (raw data provided in flat files), please fill in the on-line form at: Access to COR&DIP©
How do companies 'perceive' their intangibles? New statistical evidence from the INNOBAROMETER 2013
Sandro Montresor, Giulio Perani and Antonio Vezzani
The report provides a statistical analysis of the way European companies have shown to perceive their Intangibles in the recent Innobarometer 2013. The report is intended to complement the evidence presented in the FLASH EUROBAROMETER 369 ("Investing in Intangibles") with a deeper investigation of both the characteristics of the available micro-data and the regularities emerging from their statistical analysis. A special focus is placed on the extent to which companies perceive their intangibles as strategic and on that to which the relative investment interplay with their innovative projects. The role of context conditions vs. that of business incentives in motivating their intangible investments is also addressed.
The patenting activity of the top IRI Scoreboard Companies: an introductory note
Antonio Vezzani, Fabio Montobbio, Sandro Montresor and Gianluca Tarasconi
The present note contains an explorative, introductory analysis of the patenting activity exhibited by the top 100 companies of the IRI Scoreboard, and intends to identify strengths and weaknesses for its possible future extension to the whole Scoreboard. With respect to these companies, patent data are drawn from Patstat, on the basis of which patent families are built up, and crossed with other data on their R&D investments. Both the R&D and the patent applications of the investigated sample of companies increase over time. At the same time, important sector specificities in the R&D-patent relationship have been found. The analysis of the technological competences of the overall sample yields promising results. A first examination of the IPC classes of the patent applications suggests a certain concentration in the kind of technological knowledge that companies master. The analysis of the knowledge base and, more specifically, the companies' involvement in the creation of key enabling technologies (KETs) also highlights that important sector specificities go along with firm-specific factors. All in all, "augmenting" the Scoreboard data with company level patent information appears to be an interesting extension to be pursued.
CONCORDi-2013 Summary Report
Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, Fernando Hervás, Sandro Montresor and Antonio Vezzani
The report intends to summarise the main results of the CONCORDi-2013 Conference. Section 1 introduces the rationale and the objectives of the Conference; section 2 summarises the contribution of the keynote speakers; section 3 and 4 sum up the main results of the Parallel Sessions; session 5 introduces the Best Paper Awards, whereas section 6 briefly reports on the discussion made by the policy stakeholders. Finally, section 7 recapitulates the main conclusions.
Measuring the internationalisation of EU corporate R&D: a novel complementary use of statistical sources
The report summarises the main results of a research activity aimed at testing a novel approach for the measurement of EU business R&D internationalisation. Such approach is based on the complementary use of two different sources of data: on the one hand, statistical data from private R&D expenditure taken from national surveys (BERD); on the other hand, data collected from companies' annual reports and accounts (as in the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard).
The main objectives of the study were:
- To explore the methodological rationale for comparing the two sets of data;
- To test the robustness of the novel methodology through an analysis applied to four EU countries (Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy);
- To provide indications of possible further research and follow up activities.